Loving lwn. Virginia

Daripada Wikipedia, ensiklopedia bebas.
Lompat ke: pandu arah, cari
Loving lwn. Virginia
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Mahkamah Agung Amerika Syarikat
DidebatkanApril 10, 1967
Diputuskan Jun 12, 1967
Nama kes penuh Richard Perry Loving, Mildred Jeter Loving lwn. Virginia
Petikan 388 U.S. 1 (more)
87 S. Ct. 1817; 18 L. Ed. 2d 1010; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1082
Sejarah mendahului Defendan dihukum, Caroline County Circuit Court (6 Januari 1959); gerakan untuk mengosongkan penilaian ditolak, Caroline County Circuit Court (22 Januari 1959); menegaskan sebahagian, terbalik dan diserahkan, 147 S.E.2d 78 (Va. 1966)
Perdebatan Oral argument
Pegangan
Mahkamah menyatakan undang-undang anti-perkahwinan antara suku atau bangsa Virginia, "Undang-undang integriti kaum pada tahun 1924", tidak berperlembagaan, dengan demikian menamatkan semua undang-undang sekatan berdasarkan perkahwinan kaum di Amerika Syarikat.
Keanggotan mahkamah
Pendapat kes
Majoriti Warren, bergabung dengan bulat
Perjanjian Stewart
Undang-undang digunakan
Pemindaan XIV perlembagaan AS; Va. Code §§ 20-58, 20-59

Loving lwn. Virginia (bahasa Inggeris: Loving v. Virginia), 388 U.S. 1 (1967),[1] adalah seorang tanda tempat hak-hak sivil kes di mana Mahkamah Agung Amerika Syarikat, dengan undian 9-0, menyatakan undang-undang anti-perkahwinan antara suku atau bangsa Virginia, "Kaum Integriti undang-undang tahun 1924", tidak berperlembagaan, sehingga menjungkirbalikkan Pace lwn. Alabama (1883) dan berakhir semua undang-undang sekatan berdasarkan kaum pada perkahwinan di Amerika Syarikat.

Rujukan[sunting | sunting sumber]

Bacaan lebih lanjut[sunting | sunting sumber]

  • Aldridge, Delores (1973). "The Changing Nature of Interracial Marriage in Georgia: A Research Note". Journal of Marriage and the Family 35 (4): 641–642. doi:10.2307/350877. 
  • Annella, M. (1967). "Interracial Marriages in Washington, D.C.". Journal of Negro Education 36: 428–433. doi:10.2307/2294264. 
  • Barnett, Larry (1963). "Research on International and Interracial Marriages". Marriage and Family Living 25 (1): 105–107. doi:10.2307/349019. 
  • Brower, Brock (2003). "'Irrepressible Intimacies'. Review of Interracial Intimacies: Sex, Marriage, Identity, and Adoption, by Randall L. Kennedy". Journal of Blacks in Higher Education 40: 120–124. doi:10.2307/3134064. 
  • Coolidge, David Orgon (1998). "Playing the Loving Card: Same-Sex Marriage and the Politics of Analogy". BYU Journal of Public Law 12: 201–238. 
  • DeCoste, F. C. (2003). "The Halpren Transformation: Same-Sex Marriage, Civil Society, and the Limits of Liberal Law". Alberta Law Review 41: 619–642. 
  • Foeman, Anita Kathy & Nance, Teresa (1999). "From Miscegenation to Multiculturalism: Perceptions and Stages of Interracial Relationship Development". Journal of Black Studies 29 (4): 540–557. 
  • Hopkins, C. Quince (2004). "Variety in U.S Kinship Practices, Substantive Due Process Analysis and the Right to Marry". BYU Journal of Public Law 18: 665–679. 
  • Kalmijn, Matthijs (1998). "Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends". Annual Review of Sociology 24: 395–421. 
  • Koppelman, Andrew (1988). "The Miscegenation Analogy: Sodomy Law as Sex Discrimination". Yale Law Journal 98: 145–164. 
  • Pascoe, Peggy (1996). "Miscegenation Law, Court Cases, and Ideologies of 'Race' in Twentieth-Century America". Journal of American History 83 (1): 44–69. 
  • Walington, Walter (November 1967). Domestic Relations. 
  • Wildman, Stephanie (2002). "Interracial Intimacy and the Potential for Social Change: Review of Interracial Intimacy: The Regulation of Race and Romance by Rachel F. Moran". Berkeley Women's Law Journal 17: 153–164. doi:10.2139/ssrn.309743. 
  • Yancey, George & Yancey, Sherelyn (1998). "Interracial Dating: Evidence from Personal Advertisements". Journal of Family Issues 19 (3): 334–348. doi:10.1177/019251398019003006. 

Pautan luar[sunting | sunting sumber]