Perbincangan pengguna:MGA73: Perbezaan antara semakan

Kandungan laman tidak disokong dalam bahasa lain.
Daripada Wikipedia, ensiklopedia bebas.
Kandungan dihapus Kandungan ditambah
Farras (bincang | sumb.)
→‎Re:Fail:UGM.jpg: bahagian baru
MGA73 (bincang | sumb.)
→‎Re:Fail:UGM.jpg: Done. Thank you.
Baris 87: Baris 87:


Hi, you can now delete [[:File:UGM.jpg]]. I'll replace it with a Commons file ([[:File:Gadjah Mada HeadOffice.jpg]]). Thx! [[Pengguna:Farras|Farras]] ([[Perbincangan Pengguna:Farras|bincang]]) 17:13, 10 Ogos 2011 (UTC)
Hi, you can now delete [[:File:UGM.jpg]]. I'll replace it with a Commons file ([[:File:Gadjah Mada HeadOffice.jpg]]). Thx! [[Pengguna:Farras|Farras]] ([[Perbincangan Pengguna:Farras|bincang]]) 17:13, 10 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

:Done. Thank you. --[[Pengguna:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[Perbincangan Pengguna:MGA73|bincang]]) 20:21, 10 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

Semakan pada 20:21, 10 Ogos 2011

Selamat datang ke Wikipedia Bahasa Melayu!
Salam sejahtera MGA73! Terima kasih kerana mendaftar di Wikipedia Bahasa Melayu!
Berikut merupakan beberapa pautan yang dapat anda layari jika masih baru di Wikipedia:

Lihat juga tutorial dan meja bantuan Wikipedia. Untuk menandatangani pesanan anda pada laman perbualan, seperti laman ini, letakkan ~~~~ (empat kali tanda gelombang) atau klik butang Tandatangan dan cap waktu pada laman penyuntingan.
Semoga anda menikmati kunjungan anda di Wikipedia Bahasa Melayu. Selamat menyumbang! ...Aurora... (b) 03:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[balas]

Thank you for the offers. Those images was originally uploaded under Creative Commons licenses 2 / 2.5 non commercial. I have no desire to change the licensing.
Regards Yosri (bincang) 01:26, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[balas]

Ok. It's fine. Thank for your assistant, otherwise it will take me longer to manually updates all the images.
Regards Yosri (bincang) 01:48, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[balas]

Bot job

Please recheck again. It should be done by now except for 2 files which were being locked. Zamwan (bincang) 05:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[balas]

Thank you. Yes only 3 files left now :-) --MGA73 (bincang) 16:05, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[balas]


Well... Actually, yes. It would be easier if the tag image is unused image. Otherwise, I check manually each one. Yosri (bincang) 10:37, 16 Januari 2011 (UTC)[balas]
A better quality pic is prefered to keep, not bother by name, only for image with no file linked to. Yosri (bincang) 11:02, 16 Januari 2011 (UTC)[balas]

Licence

Dear MGA73,
I decided to take up your offer of coupling cc-by-nc-2.0 with GFDL with "migration=opt-out". I would appreciate if you can assist with the required tagging. I do not wish to spend much time on this already, but wish to continue developing MS Wiki with the time available.
Regards Yosri (bincang) 11:04, 3 Mac 2011 (UTC)[balas]

Thank you in advance for your assistance. I wish it to be dual license. I also do not have any objection to move those images to commons. Yosri (bincang) 22:00, 3 Mac 2011 (UTC)[balas]
Ok. I'm working on the files now. --MGA73 (bincang) 17:41, 4 Mac 2011 (UTC)[balas]

Just a question. These images that you transferred, why does the licensing at Commons says.. "Yosri at lb.wikipedia"? ...Aurora... (b) 15:37, 7 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]

Because I made a mistake... :-( I changed an old script but forgot to change to ms.wikipedia... I will fix that at once. --MGA73 (bincang) 16:06, 7 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]

Images

After I found an image like http://ms.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fail:Buah_ciku.jpg let me run some checks first. It was tagged as no license, yet it was given in the text and upload as GFDL. Zscout370 (bincang) 13:56, 4 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]

I have searched for files with the text "cc" or "gfdl" but there were no good hits. I hope the admins check before they delete. I noticed that some of the files were added to articles and therefore no longer unused. --MGA73 (bincang) 15:05, 4 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]

Foto

Actually those images was unsuccessfully attached to those article earlier. I just rectified the format. Yosri (bincang) 15:05, 4 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]

Oh I see. In that case it is a good idea to check an extra time before deleting the files. --MGA73 (bincang) 15:13, 4 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]
I doubt you would be able to identify them since they are in Malay. Some of it is the layout problem, but tracking the error take some doing. It take me 3 times to track this small error http://ms.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=4U2C&action=historysubmit&diff=1640675&oldid=1596797 Yosri (bincang) 15:21, 4 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]
Yes it will take some time. One trick is to check the edits made by the uploader just after the file was uploaded. I do not expect the files to be deleted "today". My hope was that a few local admins would take some files every day and delete the bad ones and save the good ones. And after some time they are all fixed. --MGA73 (bincang) 15:36, 4 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]
Batang Teratai is own work. I was using a trial software that combine photos to increase dpi to doible, with watermark on images generated. I can easily removed it using paint but decide to respect the trial software. Yosri (bincang) 22:42, 5 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]
Thank you. Fixed on Commons. --MGA73 (bincang) 17:45, 6 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]

Unused files nominated for deletion

Looks like the images nominated for deletions are those which are made available at Commons. However, it will take time to change the extensions of those images in their respective article edits. Anyway, thanks for the notification. - Hezery99 (bincang) 03:20, 5 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]

Thank you for the reply. I answered on your talk page. -MGA73 (bincang) 09:19, 5 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]
You're right. Seems like those files are no longer linked with the articles where they used to refer. It that's the case, then we can simply continue with the deletion, as the images are no longer used. - Hezery99 (bincang) 12:45, 5 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]
Thank you. Then we just need an admin to delete them :-) --MGA73 (bincang) 17:45, 6 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]

Orphans

I would run the orphan checker again. My finals are done and been working on a lot of images now. Zscout370 (bincang) 06:47, 6 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]

Cool. Orphan fair use are now nominated for deletion :-) --MGA73 (bincang) 18:29, 7 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]

Taugeh

The picture is mine and I dont see why it need to be removed. I relicense it to GFDL under duress, and is second licenses. It's up for the user who want to use it, either with long GFDL attribution OR fair use without GFDL tag. Yosri (bincang) 11:33, 18 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]

Reply on your talk page. --MGA73 (bincang) 16:09, 18 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]
It is already (also) licensed under GFDL. For commercial and Wikipedia use its GFDL, personal web who want to copy it can use it under fair use as far as Im concern. Thank you. Yosri (bincang) 22:53, 18 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]
Hi there!
Just want to cautious you, although I allow GFDL, some picture may not be suitable for common. This is because common do not allow derivative picture. Any picture with commercial logo is usually not accepted there and usually deleted. You might want to keep those in ms.
Regards. Yosri (bincang) 23:33, 25 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]
Thank you for the tip :-) Yes I know about the problems with derivative works and I check every file before I move them to Commons. If the logo is small then en:de minimis may apply. Ms-wiki allows fair use so if there are problems then the file could be changed to fair use on ms-wiki. --MGA73 (bincang) 14:38, 26 Mei 2011 (UTC)[balas]
Hi. Regarding derivative picture, I notice some picture with prominent logo is being kept there, especially western product. Any reason it was maintained, as my picture was deleted as derivative? I did keep track 3 of them just to see how long it take for common to removed it, but there is a lot more like it. Yosri (bincang) 23:26, 4 Jun 2011 (UTC)[balas]
Users are human so that could explain why there is sometimes different opinions about logos and derivative works. If the logo is "just text" it will most likely be kept. If the logo is only a small part of the picture then it will most likely be kept. I try to avoid to move files to Commons that are "problematic". Unless logos is important it is best to avoid them on the photos. If they are important the file should probably be fair use. --MGA73 (bincang) 19:21, 5 Jun 2011 (UTC)[balas]

Copyright

Hi there, Sorry for late reply. It's because I'm on mobile device a lot, it is difficult to give long reply, but great fo revert vandal. All my files that has been released under CC 2.0 can be relicense to 3.0 (attribution required by default, I persume.) & GFDL. For files where license is not stated, use GFDL. Sorry, no new files. Yosri (bincang) 03:27, 11 Jun 2011 (UTC)[balas]

re:Fail:Peta Kecamatan Tinggi Raja Kabupaten Asahan.png and other maps

Hi, Mr. MGA!

I use the license because it did not get a free license. Besides from the source site is not listed on the excessive use of copyright that I value quite safe. In WBI also I use the same license at the moment and it seems we agree to approve it. Sorry if my language is less precise because it uses the Google translation translate. Sincerely. Wagino 20100516 (bincang) 00:57, 9 Ogos 2011 (UTC)[balas]

Re:Fail:UGM.jpg

Hi, you can now delete File:UGM.jpg. I'll replace it with a Commons file (File:Gadjah Mada HeadOffice.jpg). Thx! Farras (bincang) 17:13, 10 Ogos 2011 (UTC)[balas]

Done. Thank you. --MGA73 (bincang) 20:21, 10 Ogos 2011 (UTC)[balas]