Wikipedia:Menghapuskan laman

Dalam operasi biasa Wikipedia, beberapa laman akan dipadamkan setiap hari. Walaupun sebarang pengguna boleh mengosongkan laman, kandungan asal masih tersimpan di dalam sejarah laman untuk dilihat dan dipulihkan oleh orang lain jika mereka mahu. Apabila laman dipadamkan, ini menghapuskan bukan sahaja versi semasa tetapi juga semua versi sebelumnya.

Hanya penyelia mempunyai kebolehan untuk memadam dan memulihkan laman dalam sistem. Dengan sistem pemadaman sekarang, penyelia perlu menggunakan pertimbangan terbaik untuk membuat keputusan ini. Anda boleh bergantung kepada penyelia (atau sysop) untuk mematuhi proses terperinci di bawah untuk membantu mereka dalam membuat pertimbangan mereka.

Laman yang dipadamkan boleh dipulihkan oleh penyelia, jika dan hanya jika terdapat sokongan pada undi untuk pulih laman. Jika proses padam dibuat terlalu mudah, ia mudah hilang punca. Oleh itu keputusan untuk memadamkan laman secara kekal tidak dibuat dengan mudah, dan proses pemadaman diikuti. Lihat Polisi pulih untuk panduan pulih padam.

Jika sesuatu laman dicipta banyak kali walaupun selepas dihapuskan, ia mungkin bermakna rencana tersebut memang perlu. Tetapi sekiranya sesuatu laman itu sentiasa dicalonkan untuk dipadamkan, ia bukan bermakna rencana tersebut tidak perlu, mungkin cuma perlu dibaikpulih.

Aturan untuk pemadaman

Memohon pemadaman

Untuk memohon laman atau gambar dipadam, letakkannya di senarai yang sesuai:

• <<Wikipedia:Possible copyright infringements>> - untuk kemungkinan pelanggaran hak cipta, untuk laman atau imej.
• <<Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/foreign language>> - untuk laman yang ditulis dalam bahasa asing.
• <<Wikipedia:Images for deletion>> - untuk imej dan laman gambaran imej, tidak termasuk kemungkinan pelanggaran hak cipta
• <<Wikipedia:Personal subpages to be deleted>> - untuk sub laman persendirian (Contoh, jika ia seperti <<user:NAMAANDA/tajuk>> atau <<user talk:NAMAANDA/tajuk>>)
• <<Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion>> - sebarang laman yang mengalih ke tempat lain
• <<Wikipedia:deleted test>> - sebarang "<<wikipedia:candidates for speedy deletion|candidates for speedy deletion>>" - untuk digunakan bagi bukan penyelia-Penyelia.
• <<Wikipedia:cleanup>> - Jika anda tidak pasti pemadaman bukannya pendekatan terbaik.
• <<Wikipedia:Undi untuk pemadaman>> - untuk semua laman

Sebahagian dari laman ini mempunyai prosedur berbeza - oleh itu, ia akan dijelaskan pada laman tersebut.

Berikan sebab kenapa anda percaya ia patut dipadamkan. Ia akan kekal untuk beberapa waktu, memberi peluang pengguna lain untuk memberi komen sama ada mereka fikir pemadaman adalah wajar atau tidak. Selepas tempoh yang sesuai, penyelia akan memadamkan laman sekiranya secara kasar keputusan dicapai - lihat <<Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators#rough_consensus>>.

For <<wikipedia:candidates for speedy deletion|candidates for speedy deletion>>, Penyelia do not have to request deletion - they may delete them on sight, though some choose to use <<wikipedia:deleted test>> in some cases.

Cara mengundi

When expressing an opinion, please include your opinion, your reasoning, and sign with ~~~~ (four consecutive tilde characters). Here are some suggested wordings:

• delete
• keep
• redirect to <<article>>
• merge into <<article>> and redirect
• move to (Wiktionary / Meta / other Wikipedia)
• other (some other action)
• comment (not a vote).

Note that merge into <<article>> and delete is not a valid option (except for public domain text) because it destroys the information on authorship of the content.

Sela masa

These different pages have different "lag times" -- how long a page should normally be listed before it can be deleted (an article can be removed at any time). This gives other users the chance to comment on whether they think deletion is in fact appropriate. The lag times are discussed at <<Wikipedia talk:Votes for deletion/lag time>> and are currently set at:

• <<Wikipedia:Possible copyright infringements>> - about a week
• <<Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/foreign language>> - about a week
• <<Wikipedia:Images for deletion>> - about a week
• <<Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion>> - about a week
• <<Wikipedia:Personal subpages to be deleted>> - no lag
• <<wikipedia:Deleted test>> - no lag
• <<Wikipedia:Votes for deletion>> - five days

Polisi mengundi

This section is a proposed change to the policy; please discuss at <<Wikipedia_talk:Deletion_policy>>:

To request that a page (or image) be permanently deleted,

• A user's votes will be considered valid if that user:

• has been registered at least one week before the listing, and
• has at least 25 non-minor article edits logged

Regardless of the above requirements, the page's initial author may vote (once).

• At the end of five days, if 2/3 majority vote to delete, the page will be removed. Otherwise the page remains. The page will also remain if it has been improved enough since the initial listing that the reason for listing no longer applies anymore. This requires that a reason be given initially.

"Listed for deletion" notice

See also: <<Wikipedia:Boilerplate_text#Listed_for_deletion>>

When you list a page on <<Wikipedia:Votes for deletion>> that you think will be listed for the entire 5 days (i.e., a page that won't be deleted immediately) it is courteous to let people know it might be deleted. The suggested way is to place the following or similar notice ({{subst:vfd}} is useful shorthand for this) above the page's content:

''This page has been listed as <<Wikipedia:Deletion policy|a candidate for deletion>>. In the normal day to day operations of Wikipedia, some pages are deleted. Please go to the <<Wikipedia:Votes for deletion|Votes for Deletion>> page to discuss whether this page should be deleted. If you have questions about why this page was listed, you can also ask ~~~.''

Hopefully, this notice will prevent readers and new users from becoming confused as to why a page was removed. Please note: <<wikipedia:possible copyright infringements|possible copyright infringements>> have a different suggested notice. Please use the "Copyright infringement notice" text from <<Wikipedia:Boilerplate text>> instead.

The notice is not needed for pages which a) have no content (such as <<Wikipedia:Redirect|redirects>>), and b) also have no significant history. (E.g. a redirect whose entire history is that it used to redirect from "Foo" to "Foobar", and has been changed to redirect to "FooBar", because the target page was moved, does not have any significant history.) A history which shows any content being added or removed is significant history.

Unlisting a page from VfD

If another solution has been found for some of these pages than deletion, leave them listed on <<Wikipedia:Votes for deletion>> for a short while, so the original poster can see why it wasn't deleted, and what did happen to it. This will prevent reposting of the same item. After the original poster has seen the explanation, or in any case after about a day, the page can be delisted from VfD.

proposed Nov 23: If the solution was a redirect, wait for a day to be sure that the redirect has "taken", then remove the article from VfD and list it on <<wikipedia:redirects for deletion>>, to confirm that the now-redirect isn't causing any problems.

In these cases, the VfD discussion may be useful to the further development of the article in question, or to prevent repeating the debate in the future. Therefore, consider moving VfD debate to the article's talk page (or a subpage like <<talk:NAME/deletion>>). You may also wish to list it on <<wikipedia:Archived deletion debates>>.

Always give a good <<edit summary>> when editing the VfD page, especially when unlisting a page, so that the page history of the VfD page can be used as backup archive for discussions that have not been regularly archived.

Calon undi pemadaman

If a page does not fall into one of the nine categories listed under <<Wikipedia:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion|Candidates for speedy deletion>>, then you can not delete it without it spending five days on <<Wikipedia:Votes for deletion>> first. However, there are some pages that should not be listed on VfD at all, and should be kept. This section is about whether something should be listed on VfD, or just kept. Consider the following recommendations:

• Don't list stubs for articles that have potential, but list stubs that are nonsensical. Also, <<Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect>> or list stubs that likely will never become more than a simple definition. See <<WP:STUB|fix a stub>>.

• Don't list articles that just need heavy editing; instead, list them on <<Wikipedia:Pages needing attention|Pages needing attention>>, perhaps adding a warning notice such as a <<Wikipedia:NPOV dispute|NPOV dispute>> notice to clarify the type of attention needed. However, consider listing articles that are just <<Wikipedia:Patent nonsense|patent nonsense>>.

• <<Wikipedia:Redirect|Redirect>> pages should be listed on <<Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion>> only if the problems they cause outweigh their advantages. For more info, see our <<Wikipedia:Redirect#When_should_we_delete_a_redirect?|recommendations on deleting redirects>>.

• List pages that you believe have no potential to become encyclopedia articles. For example, articles that represent completely idiosyncratic non-topics, articles that could never be more than <<Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary|dictionary definitions>>, etc.

• Don't list source texts, but replace them with an external link and a stub. Alternatively, add an external link to a related article and redirect the pages for source texts there.

• Don't list biased articles, even heavily biased articles, but add a <<Wikipedia:NPOV dispute|NPOV dispute>> header/disclaimer. However, list articles if rewriting the facts in an NPOV way and removing unattributed opinions would leave no useful information.

• List orphan images where you can't think of an article where they might be useful.

• If a page has useful content but too little even to be a stub, this content can often be moved to another page, and the page changed into a redirect. Even without useful content the page can often be usefully changed into a redirect. Do not list these pages for deletion. However, do list a page if turning it into a redirect would cause problems - see <<Wikipedia:Redirect#When_should_we_delete_a_redirect?|recommendations on deleting redirects>>.

• List articles that contain no verifiable information. However, do not list such articles until you have followed the nine-step procedure on <<Wikipedia:Verifiability>>.

FAQ

X redirects to Y, which obscures the existence of A, B, and C - it should be deleted.

It should be turned into a <<wikipedia:disambiguation|disambiguation>> page. You don't need the VfD page for that -- do it yourself.

This user should be banned.

Take it to <<wikipedia:vandalism in progress|vandalism in progress>> (for pure vandalism) or <<wikipedia:problem users|problem users>> (for annoyances). <<Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|Stay cool>>.

---

The votes for deletion page gets very busy. Please join the <<Wikipedia:Cleaning department>> to help in maintaining it on a regular basis!

Lihat juga

• <<Wikipedia:Blankpages>>, <<Wikipedia:Shortpages>>
• <<Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense>>
• <<Wikipedia:Things to be moved to Wiktionary>>
• <<Wikipedia:Pages needing attention>>
• <<Wikipedia:Personal subpages to be deleted>>
• <<Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators>>
• <<Wikipedia:Archived delete debates>> - please link /deletion pages and talk pages on which debates took place to here.
• <<Wikipedia:Transwiki log>> for articles that have been moved to another project