Sebatian bukan organik

Dalam kimia, sebatian bukan organik ialah sebatian kimia lazim yang kekurangan ikatan karbon–hidrogen, sebatian yang bukan sebatian organik. Bagaimanapun, perbezaannya tidak begitu jelas untuk ditakrifkan; pihak berkuasa telah membezakan pandangan terhadap subjek ini.^[1]^[2]^[3]

Rujukan[sunting | sunting sumber]

^ Some major textbooks on inorganic chemistry decline to define inorganic compounds: Holleman, A. F.; Wiberg, E. Inorganic Chemistry Academic Press: San Francisco, 2001. ISBN 0-12-352651-5; Greenwood, Norman N.; Earnshaw, Alan (1997). Chemistry of the Elements (ed. Kedua). Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-08-037941-8. Cite has empty unknown parameter: |name-list-format= (bantuan), Templat:Cotton&Wilkinson5th
^ J. J. Berzelius "Lehrbuch der Chemie," 1st ed., Arnoldischen Buchhandlung, Dresden and Leipzig, 1827. ISBN 1-148-99953-1. Brief English commentary in English can be found in Bent Soren Jorgensen "More on Berzelius and the vital force" J. Chem. Educ., 1965, vol. 42, p 394. DOI:10.1021/ed042p394
^ Dan Berger, Bluffton College, analysis of varying inappropriate definitions of the inorganic-organic distinction: Otherwise consistent linked material differing from current article in downplaying the carbon present vs carbon absent distinctive: [1]

[1] Some major textbooks on inorganic chemistry decline to define inorganic compounds: Holleman, A. F.; Wiberg, E. Inorganic Chemistry Academic Press: San Francisco, 2001. ISBN 0-12-352651-5; Greenwood, Norman N.; Earnshaw, Alan (1997). Chemistry of the Elements (ed. Kedua). Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-08-037941-8. Cite has empty unknown parameter: |name-list-format= (bantuan), Templat:Cotton&Wilkinson5th

[2] J. J. Berzelius "Lehrbuch der Chemie," 1st ed., Arnoldischen Buchhandlung, Dresden and Leipzig, 1827. ISBN 1-148-99953-1. Brief English commentary in English can be found in Bent Soren Jorgensen "More on Berzelius and the vital force" J. Chem. Educ., 1965, vol. 42, p 394. DOI:10.1021/ed042p394

[3] Dan Berger, Bluffton College, analysis of varying inappropriate definitions of the inorganic-organic distinction: Otherwise consistent linked material differing from current article in downplaying the carbon present vs carbon absent distinctive: [1]

[1]

[2]

[3]