Perbincangan pengguna:Aurora/Arkib10

Daripada Wikipedia, ensiklopedia bebas.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Arkib Ini ialah arkib untuk perbincangan terdahulu. Jangan sunting laman ini.
Jika anda hendak membangkitkan semula topik yang lama, anda boleh mengemukakannya dalam laman perbualan yang aktif.


Rupa lama[sunting sumber]

Bagaimana saya nak kembali kepada beta yang lama ?--Aplikasi (bincang) 11:08, 17 Januari 2011 (UTC)

Maaf, kurang faham, apa itu "beta yang lama"? ...Aurora... 07:31, 18 Januari 2011 (UTC)
Maksudnya beta seperti yang biasa digunakan. Beta yg baru tu macam sukar sedikit.Aplikasi (bincang) 07:59, 20 Januari 2011 (UTC)

Tidak mengapa.. saya dah tahu. Kena pergi ke laman keutamaan dan setkan MonoBook.Aplikasi (bincang) 08:05, 20 Januari 2011 (UTC)

Oh, itu namanya "kulit" atau "rupa", bukan beta. ...Aurora... 01:48, 21 Januari 2011 (UTC)

Tabel[sunting sumber]

Kayak mana cara bikin tabel kayak tabel Negara yang ada gambar bendera,lambang negara,dan peta? --Hp Gaul

Jika anda sekadar inginkan jadual, klik tab "Maju" di atas kotak suntingan dan klik gambar "jadual". Untuk jadual negara, rencana senarai negara mengikut kepadatan penduduk mengandungi jadual negara beserta benderanya. Anda boleh dapati lambang dan peta jika anda klik pada nama negara2 tersebut. ...Aurora... 02:01, 2 Februari 2011 (UTC)

Sinetron Cinta Fitri[sunting sumber]

kenapa padam saya buat "Kategori:Sinopsis Episod Sinetron Cinta Fitri Season 7". --Khairul akmal

Ada dua alasan. Satu, silap ruang nama, itu kan rencana/artikel, bukan kategori, mengapa buat di ruang nama kategori? Dua, kan sudah wujud di Cinta Fitri, mengapa mesti ulang? ...Aurora... 15:20, 28 Februari 2011 (UTC)

Licensing[sunting sumber]

Are you aware of the change in licensing requirement at Wiki Foundations? Yosri (bincang) 15:51, 28 Februari 2011 (UTC)

Mengenai CC-BY-NC ke? Tak, tapi saya memang tak banyak menyumbang gambar pun. ...Aurora... 11:03, 1 Mac 2011 (UTC)
Hanya hendak mengesahkan bahawa Foundation tidak berusaha mengumumkan kepada Wiki kecil mengenai polisi baru mereka. Yosri (bincang) 11:45, 1 Mac 2011 (UTC)

Sekat[sunting sumber]

Apa masalah kurosagi8? Yosri (bincang) 10:33, 7 Mac 2011 (UTC) Yosri (bincang) 10:38, 7 Mac 2011 (UTC)

Terlalu dekat dengan Kurosagi7. ...Aurora... 11:05, 7 Mac 2011 (UTC)

Monyet dan lotong[sunting sumber]

Setahu saya, monyet dan lontong kelabu tak sama. Lihat http://www.google.com/m/url?ei=aLZ0TdiqBIaGrQefoOps&q=http://www.wildlife.sabah.gov.my/edu/ekosistem%2520Marin/Marin%2520LAYOUT(N).pdf&ved=0CDAQFjAJ&usg=AFQjCNHhKUJW-ihxPKRnJp0Q7Oj38oJeLg

Yosri (bincang) 10:38, 7 Mac 2011 (UTC)

Saya gabungkan sebab:
  1. Nama sains sama (Presbytis cristata)
  2. Interwiki Monyet Kelabu pergi ke Silvery Lutung (dari segi warna, perak = kelabu)
Dokumen yg anda beri menyokong nama sains Monyet Kelabu, tapi saya tak jumpa Lotong Kelabu. ...Aurora... 11:05, 7 Mac 2011 (UTC)
http://www.wildlife.gov.my/printed_material/kbdMamClist/LotongKelabu.pdf Yosri (bincang) 12:26, 7 Mac 2011 (UTC)
Dokumen kedua itu tidak berlawanan dengan apa yg saya tulis sebelum ini. Sekiranya anda baca betul2 suntingan saya, anda akan sedar Presbytis cristata adalah sinonim Trachypithecus cristatus. Ini juga disokong dokumen Akta Pemuliharaan Hidupan Liar 2010. ...Aurora... 13:50, 8 Mac 2011 (UTC)
Saya tidak menjumpai sebarang dokumen yang menyatakan dengan jelas bahawa Presbytis cristata = Trachypithecus cristatus. Saya tidak menerima nama Melayu yang sama digunakan pada dokumen berbeza sebagai sahih, kerana nama Melayu kadang kala merujuk kepada beberapa spesies berlainan dengan nama yang sama. Ini bedasarkan pengalaman saya menyusun rencana pokok, di mana beberapa spesies dikenali dengan nama yang sama (contoh pokok balik angin). Mungkin anda patut letakkan rujukkan anda yang menyatakan Presbytis cristata = Trachypithecus cristatus. Mungkin anda boleh rujuk di wikispesies. Selain itu, boleh saya tahu alasan pengunduran rencana Mahathir. Sekadar ingin tahu. Yosri (bincang) 14:30, 8 Mac 2011 (UTC)
Baca m/s. 78 dan 146 dokumen yg saya beri itu, ada disebutkan dua nama saintifik Lotong Kelabu. Lihat juga nama imej ini. Kalau anda ingat, dah banyak kali saya gabungkan rencana haiwan/tumbuhan yg anda cipta, dan saya akan bertanya dahulu sekiranya saya tak pasti.
Mengenai rencana Mahathir, saya cuma membuang 4 perenggan berulang. ...Aurora... 15:03, 8 Mac 2011 (UTC)
Saya pasti anda sudah membuat pencarian sebelumnya, sebab itu saya tidak mengundurkan suntingan anda kali kedua. Suntingan anda sebelumnya (pada rencana haiwan), berbeza kerana ia memiliki nama saintifik yang sama, sebab itu saya ingin memastikan anda ada rujukannya. Saya hanya bertanya jika ada suntingan yang meragukan. :) Yosri (bincang) 15:07, 8 Mac 2011 (UTC)

Perancangan televisyen[sunting sumber]

Saya terjemahkan berdasarkan en:Television programming yang dilencongkan ke en:Broadcast programming. Mungkin saya telah silap, sila bantu betulkan. Kategori:Perancangan televisyen bukan cereka juga rasanya salah. --Kurnia [ bual ] 16:10, 12 Mac 2011 (UTC)

Saya setuju saja. Kategori:Perancangan televisyen rasanya patut dihapuskan supaya tidak digunakan lagi dimasa hadapan. --Kurnia [ bual ] 16:19, 12 Mac 2011 (UTC)

Pengguna:Hp Gaul[sunting sumber]

Hai Aurora. Pengguna ini masih tidak serik dan bertindak melakukan laku musnah pula (sila lihat log beliau sebagai bukti). Saya harap tindakan sewajarnya diambil. Harap maklum. — Alistaire | عليستير (bincang) 09:45, 24 Mac 2011 (UTC)

Tindakan telah diambil, harap2 dia sedar dan berubah. ...Aurora... 10:12, 24 Mac 2011 (UTC)

Fair use on ms-wiki[sunting sumber]

Hi! An you know ms-wiki allows fair use. But there is no information about that here m:Non-free_content#Wikipedia. As I understand it ms-wiki has this page about fair use: Wikipedia: Kandungan tidak bebas but it seems to me that this page is more a general page about fair use and not a specific guide like the en-wiki version for example: en:Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. If I have got that part right perhaps a formal Fair use policy / Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) should be developed per this Resolution: Licensing policy. If you agree could you spread the word to where it belongs? --MGA73 (bincang) 17:05, 28 Mac 2011 (UTC)

You got it right, I'll work on it in the next few days. ...Aurora... 05:01, 29 Mac 2011 (UTC)
Done. ...Aurora... 07:53, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Fantastic! Good work. It looks really good!!! I suppose there will be a notice somewhere so other users can comment. So if there is no big protests we can check the files nice and slow. Is there a template and a category and perhaps also a page to discuss deletions? Or do we just add a "delete" if we think file does not meet the criterias? --MGA73 (bincang) 18:08, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, they can comment at the talk page. We don't really use a specific template for image deletion, but see Templat:Deletable file. Normally the general one is sufficient though, so take your pick. Discussions are normally held at the talk page, unless it became contentious, then a page can be created. ...Aurora... 07:37, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Pengguna:Tanduay1[sunting sumber]

Satu lagi pengguna melaku musnah. — Alistaire | عليستير (bincang) 06:32, 30 Mac 2011 (UTC)

Tidak mengapa. Saya lihat dia telah disekat oleh penyelia asing. — Alistaire | عليستير (bincang) 06:52, 30 Mac 2011 (UTC)
Itu steward. ...Aurora... 14:57, 30 Mac 2011 (UTC)

On Upin & Ipin page[sunting sumber]

Hi Aurora,

I'm Ehsan from Les' Copaque and I'm updating the page with some current information. Am open to any discussions and questions for any of the updates I did. Feel free to ask about anything yea?

And great job at the previous updates. :) Couldn't have done it better myself. --Ehsanazhar

Hai Ehsan. Sumbangan anda dialu-alukan. Cuma satu yang saya minta, rujukan. Kami orang luar tak tahu sama ada maklumat yg diberikan betul atau tidak, jadi kalau ada sumber ke laman web yg boleh dipercayai (Les' Copaque misalnya), kan bagus. ...Aurora... 06:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Padam[sunting sumber]

Kenapa padam yang saya cipta di Templat:Ta16. --Khairul akmal

Kerana anda meletakkan "fakta" yang tidak disokong rencana terbabit, dan juga atas sebab2 yg disebutkan Hezery99 di laman perbualan anda, ...Aurora... 23:54, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Kenapa awak boleh tukar sumber tetapi saya tidak?..... --Khairul akmal

Kerana anda bukan penyelia. Lihat juga penerangan Hezery99 di Kedai Kopi. ...Aurora... 02:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

GFDL-files[sunting sumber]

Hi! Perhaps this can interesst you Perbincangan_Pengguna:BukanTeamBiasa#License_migration :-) --MGA73 (bincang) 19:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

As I'm sure you've noticed, plenty of files here are incorrectly tagged (or missing tags completely). As such, I do not think the idea is currently practical. I certainly do not have the time to check all the images, and I don't know if anybody else is interested or have time to do so. ...Aurora... 14:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Yeah that is true. I will check the files I can and skip the ones I do not understand. Hopefully it will be easier when/if the good files are on Commons and deleted locally :-) --MGA73 (bincang) 09:41, 1 Mei 2011 (UTC)
I created Kategori:Deletion checked by MGA73 - will that be a help?
I also copied a tool for easy categorization to ms-wiki - see [1] and the next edits for an example. It adds a "(-) (±) | (+)" next to the categories and you can just click the + to add a category etc. --MGA73 (bincang) 10:23, 1 Mei 2011 (UTC)
If you (and Zscout370) can help, that would of course be great. And I appreciate the category, double checking is always good.
As for HotCat, we actually have a gadget for that. ...Aurora... 02:47, 2 Mei 2011 (UTC)
Ok I will add the catgory on files I have checked. And I also found the official Hotcat :-D --MGA73 (bincang) 07:04, 2 Mei 2011 (UTC)
I got university finals soon, but I will do what I can to help. I am also transferring images from, lets say, en.wikipedia to the Commons so there is only 1 image. Zscout370 (bincang) 14:58, 2 Mei 2011 (UTC)
I noticed you killed a lot of files today :-) Cool. I have been thinking about this. I'm also an admin on en-wiki and lb-wiki only to help with files (I'm also an admin on da-wiki and commons). If you are interessted to have more admins to help with files both Zscout370 (admin on en-wiki Commons + global admin for those who has opted in for that) and I know about files. If we start transfering files to Commons hundreds or thousands of files will end up as "Gambar Commons". --MGA73 (bincang) 21:48, 2 Mei 2011 (UTC)
And speaking from my view, there are a lot of images that turn out to be copyright issues (http://ms.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fail:AlWafeerB747.jpg is an example). I would like to help with the images in any way possible, but if many of the admins at the Malay Wikipedia are not able to devote time to it, I want to focus on it. Zscout370 (bincang) 21:51, 2 Mei 2011 (UTC)
My priority is removing duplicate and (copyright-wise) problematic images. Files in "Gambar Commons" don't really harm anyone so there's no rush. However if the two of you want (to temporarily become admins) to mass delete these files, I don't think it's my decision. The other admins/editors must be consulted first. ...Aurora... 08:26, 3 Mei 2011 (UTC)
Sure... Just wanted to hear your opinion. Admins (temporarily or not) should always be approved by the editors! The reason I think it is good to delete "Gambar Commons" files is that they are also in the other categories and therefore we may risk check the same files over and over. Also it seems that if a category has many files not many users will check the files. If a big part of the files are deleted there is a bigger chance that someone will have a look at the rest of the files. --MGA73 (bincang) 16:06, 3 Mei 2011 (UTC)
I am willing to go through a process or vote. Zscout370 (bincang) 19:14, 3 Mei 2011 (UTC)
MGA73, I see what you mean. A question, when a picture from en.wiki is transferred to Commons, how soon is it deleted? Immediately, a few days? About the adminship, I've laid out the question at Wikipedia:Kedai Kopi (dasar)#Penyelia sementara. ...Aurora... 07:50, 4 Mei 2011 (UTC)
For en.wikipedia, I usually delete the image immediately after moving. Other admins, I would say about a week (but we also have few admins that work on images there). Zscout370 (bincang) 12:24, 4 Mei 2011 (UTC)
They can be delete as soon as an admin has checked that the information has been transferred correctly to Commons. A year ago it could take months/years before they were deleted (there was more than 30.000 files). Some hardworking admins have been working nonstop for weeks and at the moment files are deleted the same day. --MGA73 (bincang) 15:11, 4 Mei 2011 (UTC)
And thank you for raising the question about temporary admins. Personally I would prefer to focus on the "NowCommons" files because they can be deleted without problems. The unused fair use are harder because they can be "saved" by adding the files to an article. I think that local users are better to decide where a file would be useful. If there are not enough local admins that can spend time to work on fair use files etc. then I will ofcourse be willing to work on those files too but it will take more time than the NowCommons files. --MGA73 (bincang) 15:32, 4 Mei 2011 (UTC)
Noted. ...Aurora... 02:27, 5 Mei 2011 (UTC)

2011 Board Elections[sunting sumber]

Hello! I see you helped with translating the 2009 board election pages into Malay, and was wondering if you'd be able to help translating them this year as well, or maybe help find someone who can? We have tried to keep as much as possible similar to the 2009 pages, so the election pages shouldn't be that much work. The translation coordination page can be found at m:Board elections/2011/Translation. Thanks, Jon Harald Søby (bincang) 15:39, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I'll try to do it before voting starts. ...Aurora... 02:27, 5 Mei 2011 (UTC)
Done, except for candidate presentations. ...Aurora... 02:16, 23 Mei 2011 (UTC)

Blocked without a notice[sunting sumber]

Hi! User:Malekhanif just blocked Zscout370 without a warning and without a notice why. Malekhanif never commented the notes I added on Perbincangan_Pengguna:Malekhanif so I'm not sure how well Malekhanif understand English. I think Zscout370 was blocked because he made this edit [2]. But the files have no license so I think the block (and the revert) is wrong. Could you perhaps talk to Malekhanif? --MGA73 (bincang) 19:10, 16 Mei 2011 (UTC)

Talked to him, no answer too. ...Aurora... 02:16, 23 Mei 2011 (UTC)

Photo requests[sunting sumber]

Hi! I read your note back in February about the accessibility of the places at the Kuala Lumpur airports. If it is not possible for people to access the buildings themselves it is okay if the photograph the entrances to the buildings. E.G. when a British person found that he could not photograph the head office of the en:Air Accident Investigation Branch in the UK, I told him it would be okay if he got the main gate. He did, and I am using that photo in the article :) WhisperToMe (bincang) 01:21, 23 Mei 2011 (UTC)

Oh, that's not what I mean, I don't know whether it is possible or not for people to access the buildings. What I mean is the airports aren't in the city, you don't go there unless you're flying. Having said that, Pengguna:B777cockpit appears to work with Malaysia Airlines, maybe you can try to contact him (though he hasn't logged in recently). ...Aurora... 02:16, 23 Mei 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know about him :)
I'm aware that the airports are not in the city center. Some Wikipedians who live in the center city may be willing to drive out to the airports just to get photos, and some Wikipedians who live in the center city are not willing to, so it may depend on who I ask
WhisperToMe (bincang) 05:54, 23 Mei 2011 (UTC)

SpongeBob Movie and Charlotte's Web[sunting sumber]

Hi, I think the page The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie could use some cleanup and Charlotte's Web (filem 1973) has an untranslated plot section. Thanks. Cyxz (bincang) 02:26, 26 Mei 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. ...Aurora... 02:31, 26 Mei 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I moved Ratatouille to Ratatouille (film), but I forgot the spelling in Malay for film is filem so I had to fix it, could you delete the incorrect redirect? Also, on all the pages, I don't think the talk pages need redirects either? And here's another incorrect one: Charlotte's Web (filem) redirects to Charlotte's Web (filem 1973), but there are two movies named Charlotte's Web, and that redirect was moved by a vandal account. Also, could there be a plot summary for the movie? It's already posted on Javanese in case that's easier to translate. Cyxz (bincang) 23:00, 29 Mei 2011 (UTC)
I'll fix the redirects. As for the plots, sorry, I prefer to do something else. ...Aurora... 01:41, 31 Mei 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of files in the subcategories of Kategori:Rencana untuk dipadamkan[sunting sumber]

Hi! There are some files in the subcategories of Kategori:Rencana untuk dipadamkan. As I understand it this should all files without a license or with an invalid fair use rationale. Before I start deleting the files I would like to hear if that is correct and if you have an idea how to do it. It would be best if files are checked one by one before they are deleted. Should we add a notice somewhere to have other users help checking and perhaps deleting? --MGA73 (bincang) 20:08, 1 Jun 2011 (UTC)

It certainly would be best if the files are checked one by one. Plenty of them are still wrongly tagged/categorised. I suppose you can put a notice somewhere (e.g. WP:KKD), but it's probably necessary to inform users who uploaded multiple images in these categories. ...Aurora... 03:14, 2 Jun 2011 (UTC)

Undilah saya![sunting sumber]

Halo, Aurora!

Undilah saya untuk menjadi Penyelia di Wikipedia Bahasa Indonesia di sini. Sokongan Anda sangat saya harapkan. Salam sejahtera. Wagino 20100516 (bincang) 03:33, 2 Jun 2011 (UTC)

Terima kasih telah mengundi saya meskipun dengan suara abstain. Saya sudah cukup gembira dengan sokongan Anda meskipun sepertinya pada pemilihan ini saya masih gagal untuk menjadi penyelia di Wikipedia Bahasa Indonesia. Jika saya gagal kemungkinan disebabkan oleh masalah ini dan juga hal ini. Namun seharusnya menurut saya seorang penyelia haruslah berjiwa besar dan berani untuk berbual: Katakanlah yang benar itu benar dan yang salah itu salah.
Salam sejahtera. Wagino 20100516 (bincang) 02:14, 5 Jun 2011 (UTC)
Masalah berkecuali/abstain ya? Di sini, suara berkecuali digunakan untuk memenuhi kuorum, tetapi tidak dikira bagi keputusan. ...Aurora... 02:16, 6 Jun 2011 (UTC)

Penyelia yang saya maksudkan adalah yang di WBI, bukan di WBM. Kerana sepertinya (menurut saya, hanya praduga) dianggap semacam menyerang penyelia lama. Juga mengenai abstain, untuk saat ini di WBI dianggap sebagai suara tidak setuju. Terima kasih. Wagino 20100516 (bincang) 03:32, 6 Jun 2011 (UTC)

Information about the WP:USURP page[sunting sumber]

Hello! Please forgive me for writing in English. I hold the SUL account to the Ekin username. I would like to usurp that in ms.wiki too. But I could not find the WP:USURP page here. Here is my talk page: en:User_talk:Ekin. Can you help me? Thanks in advance! -- 78.188.64.172 13:10, 2 Jun 2011 (UTC)

We have only one page for changing/usurping usernames, please go to WP:CHU. ...Aurora... 02:49, 3 Jun 2011 (UTC)
Thank you very much for information. Here is my application. I hope you allow usurpations too. The target user is inactive already and I am trying to secure my SUL. Have a nice day! --78.188.64.172 09:15, 3 Jun 2011 (UTC)

Replacable fair use[sunting sumber]

Hi! It has been suggested to replace Fail:Khomeini.jpg with a free file from Commons. Do you think this particular file is important or could it be replaced? I suggest a local user deside since I have problems reading the language :-) --MGA73 (bincang) 19:27, 5 Jun 2011 (UTC)

It could be replaced. I also see there are many other images in Commons. ...Aurora... 02:16, 6 Jun 2011 (UTC)

Prihatin[sunting sumber]

Assalamualaikum dan Salam Wikipedia birokat Aurora.

Baru-baru ni saya lihat telah banyak rencana-rencana berusurkan lucah seperti Kebogelan, Kebogelan di tempat awam, Fotografi bogel dan lain-lain telah mula bercambah di Wikipedia bahasa Melayu. Malah rencana-rencana tersebut turut memuatkan gambar-gambar bersifat "pornografi" dan "lucah". Saya rasa agak khuatir jika lambakan rencana dan gambar-gambar seperi ini terus bermaharaja lela dalam Wikipedia lebih lebih lagi di Wikipedia bahasa Melayu, saya agak takut nanti ada pihak melabelkan Wikipedia sumber bahan lucah pula.

Bagi pandangan saya, jika bahan lucah itu dapat dikawal ia mungkin lebih bagus, atau setiap satu rencana terbitan yang mungkin mengandungi usur seks dan lucah dapat di WAJIBKAN untuk di tag dengan tag 18sx yang kita ada pada setakat ini.

Kalau kita merujuk kepada polisi NPOV dan POV, ia kelihatan agak OK untuk menerima kehadiran rencana dan imej lucah dan seks seperti ini, tapi pandangan saya mungkin Wikipedia bahasa Melayu mempunyai pendirian yang lain?

Mungkin isu ini kita dapat buka pada umum di Kedai Kopi kita bagaimana? untuk kita membincangkannya.

Disini saya pautan sedikat bingkisan perbincangan berkenaan isu ini di Wikipedia bahasa Inggeris oleh penyumbang disana [3].

Sekian, terima kasih--Smim90 (bincang) 16:22, 21 Jun 2011 (UTC)

Isu gambar lucah bukanlah isu birokrat semata2 tapi isu masyarakat WBM seluruhnya, jadi silakan mengutarakannya di Kedai Kopi. Bagaimanapun, sesetengah rencana yg anda sebutkan itu bahasanya tunggang langgang dan tidak saya fahami, mungkin lebih baik dihapuskan sahaja jika tidak diperbaiki. ...Aurora... 02:30, 23 Jun 2011 (UTC)

fail tak gunə[sunting sumber]

Aurora, maafkan saya karena kemarin saya berbuat laku musnah. Tapi sekarang ini bisa tak hapus/padam fail tak guna ini ==> Fail:Italienischer Maler des 17 ms.jpg --Erik Evrest 08:00, 28 Jun 2011 (UTC)

Lain kali anda boleh gunakan teg {{hapus|sebab mahu dihapuskan}}. ...Aurora... 02:41, 29 Jun 2011 (UTC)

Copyright[sunting sumber]

Hi Aurora, I think you'd better massively delete Mikako's picts, actually I didn't find anything which could be hosted on Wikipedia, dealing with that it's not eligible for "fair-use" (afaik Promosi is a sort of fair-use) since there are several other ways to get an equivalent picture and, first of all, it doesn't accomply to Wikimedia's EDP (which works on every Wikipedias hosted by WMF), best regards! --Vituzzu (bincang) 21:40, 30 Jun 2011 (UTC)

"Massively deleted" the new pics since warning has been given. As for the old pics, tagging them with {{SeeCommons|filename.jpg}} would greatly help matters. ...Aurora... 02:29, 1 Julai 2011 (UTC)
See commons? Actually they're all copyviols and are not eligible for fair-use nor EDP, the same for that and other, please, can you explain me how they can abide by EDP? --Vituzzu (bincang) 10:08, 1 Julai 2011 (UTC)
Under Malaysia law, fair use is allowed
"(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), the right of control under that subsection does not include the right to control—(a) the doing of any of the acts referred to in subsection (1)by way of fair dealing for purposes of non-profit research, private study, criticism, review or the reporting of current events, subject to the condition that if such use is public, it is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the title of the work and its authorship, except where the work is in connection with the doing of any of such acts for the purposes of non-profit research, private study and the reporting of current events by means of a sound recording, film or broadcast;
(b) the doing of any of the acts referred to in subsection (1) by way of parody, pastiche or caricature;
(c) the inclusion in a film or broadcast of any artistic work situated in a place where it can be viewed by the public;
(d) the reproduction and distribution of copies of any artistic work permanently situated in a place where it can be viewed by the public;
(e) the incidental inclusion of a work in an artistic work, sound recording, film or broadcast;" http://www.agc.gov.my/Akta/Vol.%207/Act%20332.pdf
In addition, the images is small, low quality, and already widely available in Internet. Yosri (bincang) 13:43, 1 Julai 2011 (UTC)
Yep, but singers' picts are not eligible for fair-use nor EDP! --Vituzzu (bincang) 13:48, 1 Julai 2011 (UTC)

First you said they're all copyviols and then you admit some of them are not. And then you gave me another diff that is no different from the first (I did both within minutes of each other). So forgive me if I'm quite sceptical of your arguments. ...Aurora... 15:08, 3 Julai 2011 (UTC)

ZOMG...I changed the diff since the last one was more explicative, anyway why don't you answer about these diffs, the first one or both?
Pictures were all copyvios since they were tagged as PD, then you start tagging all them as fair-use, then I let fair-use template on those which are acceptable as fair-use (Yosri gave me a pdf about Malaysian law about fair-use) according to EDP.
You may be sceptical about my reasons but I cannot be sceptical about your since I cannot see any argument against deletion.
Here more detailed explanation, actually I have no objections to have them deleted overriding local consensus or local policies which don't comply with EDP (those respecting Malay law are ok) but I really prefer to solve problems locally not forcing any decision. --Vituzzu (bincang) 15:23, 3 Julai 2011 (UTC)
Be exasperated as you wish. I did what I thought is ok, fair use images are allowed with proper licensing & reason. Fact is you backtracked/changed tactics half way. I also DIDN'T "start tagging all them as fair-use" as you claimed. In fact I deleted some (more than I tagged as fair use). You might want to start afresh, your "attacking mode" isn't working here. You're not the first one to ask us to mass delete pics you know. ...Aurora... 15:40, 3 Julai 2011 (UTC)

Again I don't see any answer about *facts*, moving the lights upon other people is an old technique (to escape from question)...even older than copyvio! Actually I didn't change tactics, since I have no sakes in deletion or keeping image, my only point is deleting picts which cannot be hosted on wiki, matter of fact things changed when you start tagging as fair-use some picts, don't you agree they had to be deleted as PD-user?
Anyway, let's change tactics (as you like to say), here a list of Mikako's "surviving" files:

  1. Fail:Nakagawa Haruka (2011).jpg ‎ 1 - 2 - 3
  2. Fail:Nakaya Sayaka (2011).jpg 1 - 2 - 3
  3. Fail:Takajo Aki (2011).jpg 1 - 2 - 3
  4. Fail:AKBINGO!.jpg now it's ok
  5. Fail:Matsui Sakiko (2011).jpg ‎ 1 - 2 - 3
  6. Fail:Moeno Nito (2011).jpg ‎ 1 - 2 - 3
  7. Fail:Sato Sumire (2011).jpg 1 - 2 - 3
  8. Fail:Masuda Yuka (2011).jpg 1 - 2 - 3
  9. Fail:Suzuki Shihori (2010).jpg 1 - 2 - 3
  10. Fail:Miyazaki Miho (2011).jpg ‎ 1 - 2 - 3
  11. Fail:Sakura Kara no Tegami.png 2 - 3‎
  12. Fail:Shinoda Mariko (2011).jpg 1 - 2 - 3
  13. Fail:Kashiwagi Yuki (2011).jpg ‎1 - 2 - 3
  14. Fail:Not Yet - Naminori Kakigoori (C).jpg 4
  15. Fail:Not Yet - Naminori Kakigoori (B).jpg 4
  16. Fail:Not Yet - Naminori Kakigoori (A).jpg 4
  17. Fail:Komori Mika (2011).jpg ‎ 1 - 2 - 3
  18. Fail:Shuumatsu Not yet C.jpg ‎ 4
  19. Fail:Shuumatsu Not yet B.jpg 4
  20. Fail:Shuumatsu Not yet A.jpg 4
  21. Fail:Notyetsny.jpg 1 - 2 - 3
  22. Fail:Watanabe Mayu (2011).jpg ‎ 1 - 2 - 3
  23. Fail:Yokoyama Yui (2011).jpg 1 - 2 - 3
  24. Fail:Miyazawa Sae (2011).jpg 1 - 2 - 3
  25. Fail:Uchida Mayumi (2011).jpg ‎1 - 2 - 3
  26. Fail:Umeda Ayaka (2011).jpg 1 - 2 - 3
  27. Fail:Oshima Yuko (2011).jpg 1 - 2 - 3
  28. Fail:Katayama Haruka (2011).jpg 1 - 2 - 3
  29. Fail:Densen Uta movie poster.jpg now it's ok
  30. Fail:Yamadanana.jpg 1 - 2 - 3
  31. Fail:Nmb48dec2010.jpg 1 - 2
  32. Fail:MajisukaGakuenDramacomingsoon.png 2
  33. Fail:MajisukaGakuen2comingsoon.jpg 2

Here the issues (referring to the upper list notes):

  1. Doesn't comply with EDP, it's possible to get a free image instead of this
  2. Seems to be made in Japan which doesn't seem to allow fair-use (this is a new point which should be discussed)
  3. Doesn't meet general principles of fair-use
  4. Should be tagged as a cd cover, does they refer to the same disc?

Finally mine is not an attack towards Malay community, e. g. some days ago I had to delete about 40 photos on scn.wiki (I'm a native SCN-speaker) which had been hosted for years! On it.wiki we found lot of copyvios (on text), made by the same user, after a year... --Vituzzu (bincang) 19:01, 3 Julai 2011 (UTC)

I could not help to notice this discussion. The whole idea of the WMF-resolution is that EDP should be used "to illustrate historically significant events, to include identifying protected works such as logos, or to complement (within narrow limits) articles about copyrighted contemporary works". However, it may also apply for articles for notable individuals but the resolutions says "An EDP may not allow material where we can reasonably expect someone to upload a freely licensed file for the same purpose, such as is the case for almost all portraits of living notable individuals.". Also see Wikipedia:Kriteria kandungan tidak bebas in #1: "Tiada karya setara bebas. Kandungan tidak bebas digunakan hanya apabila tiada karya setara bebas tersedia, atau boleh dihasilkan, yang menyampaikan tujuan ensiklopedia sama."
I agree that the argument may apply to a few people that do not show them self in public but you can not argue that it is not possible to take a photo of popstars. Just check Commons:Category:AKB48.
So the files must be deleted. --MGA73 (bincang) 19:32, 3 Julai 2011 (UTC)

Vituzzu and MGA73, thank you for the much nicer and clearer explanations. I now agree that the images marked ‎"1 - 2 - 3" above should be deleted. ...Aurora... 14:31, 4 Julai 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for you work on this wiki, actually I was a bit too harsh at the beginning but there's so much work to do :S
Eventually I learnt something about Malay Law and you learnt something about EDP so it was a good deal, isn't it? ;)
--Vituzzu (bincang) 21:44, 7 Julai 2011 (UTC)

bantu aku[sunting sumber]

Rora, tolong donk buat gambar WikiBar yang terdapat di id:Pengguna:Erik Evrest/Bak Pasir di Wikipedia Indonesia pada bagian "Usulan Halaman Utama" dibagiannya "30 Juni dalam sejarah" menyatu dengan kotak kuning yang ada diatasnya. Berlaki-kali ku bereksperimen tak berhasil mulu. --Erik Evrest 06:30, 1 Julai 2011 (UTC)

Sudah saya lihat2, saya juga tidak mengerti di mana silapnya. Maaf tidak dapat membantu. ...Aurora... 15:08, 3 Julai 2011 (UTC)

Files without a license[sunting sumber]

Hi Aurora!

At the moment there is 2.690 files in Kategori:Imej yang tidak diketahui status hakcipta. As you can see here (Perbincangan Pengguna:Kerina yin) it sometimes help to to inform the uploaders about the missing license. But it takes a lot of time to add manually so I was thinking it could be done with a bot. But I need help translate the standard text form English. Perhaps you can help me translate?

My suggestion is this:

____

Files need a valid license

Hi (User)!

Thank you for your uploads. I noticed that some of the files you uploaded does not have a license (see list below). You can help us by adding a license and a source. Source could be "Own work" if you took the photo yourself or created the file yourself. If you found the photo/file somewhere else please add a link to the website or tell us where you found the file.

Files without a valid license should be deleted so we hope you read this notice and can help us with at license so we can keep the file.

Thank you in advance.

____

Feel free to suggest changes or comment if you have a better idea. Once it is translated I will try to get help to inform the uploaders. --MGA73 (bincang) 20:37, 4 Julai 2011 (UTC)

Glad to see that. My translation (with minor changes) as follows:

Fail tanpa lesen sah

Hai (Pengguna)!

Terima kasih atas muat naik anda. Saya perasan sebahagian fail yang anda muat naik tidak memiliki lesen (lihat senarai di bawah). Anda boleh membantu kami dengan meletakkan lesen dan sumbernya. Sumber boleh jadi "Karya sendiri" jika anda mengambil gambar tersebut/menggunakan kamera anda sendiri atau mencipta sendiri fail tersebut. Jika anda mengambil foto/fail itu di tempat lain, sila berikan pautan ke tapak web berkaitan atau nyatakan di mana anda menjumpainya.

Fail tanpa lesen sah boleh dihapuskan, jadi kami amat berharap anda membantu kami menambah lesen supaya fail-fail tersebut dapat dikekalkan.

Kerjasama anda amatlah dihargai dan didahului dengan ucapan terima kasih.

...Aurora... 02:20, 6 Julai 2011 (UTC)

Fail tanpa lesen sah[sunting sumber]

Hai! Terima kasih atas muat naik anda. Saya perasan sebahagian fail yang anda muat naik tidak memiliki lesen (lihat senarai di bawah). Anda boleh membantu kami dengan meletakkan lesen dan sumbernya. Sumber boleh jadi ÔÇÿKarya sendiriÔÇÖ jika anda mengambil gambar tersebut/menggunakan kamera anda sendiri atau mencipta sendiri fail tersebut. Jika anda mengambil foto/fail itu di tempat lain, sila berikan pautan ke tapak web berkaitan atau nyatakan di mana anda menjumpainya.

Fail tanpa lesen sah boleh dihapuskan, jadi kami amat berharap anda membantu kami menambah lesen supaya fail-fail tersebut dapat dikekalkan.

Kerjasama anda amatlah dihargai dan didahului dengan ucapan terima kasih.

  1. Fail:NurFathiahDiaz1.jpg

--MGA73bot (bincang) 22:16, 11 Julai 2011 (UTC)

Hi! Thank you for the help with the translation. As you can se I added a notice to the users. There is a "typo" as you can se (the ÔÇÿ and ÔÇÖ) but I think users will understand the notice anyway :-) Perhaps you can help me keeping an eye on Perbincangan Pengguna:MGA73bot and Perbincangan Pengguna:MGA73 and help me answer the messages? --MGA73 (bincang) 06:46, 12 Julai 2011 (UTC)
I'll take a look. ...Aurora... 06:49, 12 Julai 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. Did you notice the first comment (Hapuskan saje. — Syarikat Pemunggahan Rencana (bincang) 00:54, 12 Julai 2011 (UTC))? --MGA73 (bincang) 07:31, 12 Julai 2011 (UTC)
Yes, it means "just delete it/them". ...Aurora... 07:41, 12 Julai 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. That was my guess too but it is nice to be sure before I delete something :-) --MGA73 (bincang) 11:33, 12 Julai 2011 (UTC)

List of files without a license or a license that I do not know (yet) if free or non-free[sunting sumber]

Hi! I made a list of files without a license or a license that I do not know (yet) if free or non-free here: Pengguna:MGA73/Sandbox

The reason I'm not sure about Templat:Non-free currency is that is says that some currencies are PD and others are not. So the template is perhaps not a license template but some sort of information. So perhaps this template also needs another license. A PD or a fairuse. I will check the files later but if you have an idea about the currencies it would be super. --MGA73 (bincang) 08:02, 16 Julai 2011 (UTC)

I'll cover these by the uploaders:
  1. Harrykamil & Solihin97: no idea.
  2. Rafzan: album covers.
  3. Saikai: school badges, fixed.
  4. Zamwan: Better ask him yourself.
  5. Syarikat Pemunggahan Rencana: Templat:Non-free currency is just a translation of the same template in en.wiki.
As for the unused files, they have to be checked them one-by-one. ...Aurora... 02:49, 18 Julai 2011 (UTC)

What do you think of this[sunting sumber]

Hi Aurora! You noticed this and commented. It seems that nothing happend. Also not with the next notice. Do you think user is angry? Or just busy? Any idea what to do? There are many files without a valid license. --MGA73 (bincang) 18:02, 22 Julai 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure, I asked him whether it's ok to tag his old images as GFDL since that's what he used for his new images. ...Aurora... 04:51, 24 Julai 2011 (UTC)

Suggest mass deletion of files uploaded by Pengguna:Firq[sunting sumber]

Hi! I suggest a mass deletion of files uploaded by Pengguna:Firq. Many files are taken from the internet without adding a source and some are uploaded as own work. I could not find a page to suggest this - perhaps you can help? --MGA73 (bincang) 19:46, 22 Julai 2011 (UTC)

I'm not in favour mass deletion, but if you want to do that, he should at least be notified. Anyway I see you've also tagged some of them. ...Aurora... 04:51, 24 Julai 2011 (UTC)
Ok I left a note here Perbincangan_Pengguna:Firq#Files from the internet and listed some of the files from the Internet. --MGA73 (bincang) 17:56, 24 Julai 2011 (UTC)

Adding source when uploading files[sunting sumber]

Hi! The uploads by Pengguna:Firq (above) and this Perbincangan_Pengguna:Smim90#Fail:Sebatik_2.jpg made me think that perhaps it could be made more clear when uploading files that there should always be a source. Either a link or a statment "I made this photo" (or whatever). And files without that statement or a link should be tagges with a "no source" or deleted. In many cases a local template like Template:nolicense is better than me trying to explain it in English. If you agree perhaps you could help write one and/or find a place to inform the admins and users about it and the importance of adding a source? --MGA73 (bincang) 21:42, 7 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

I think the two-prong approach is good; reminding the uploaders and tagging the images. Most of them understand English at least a bit. I'll create Templat:nosource to complement "nolicense" and tweak the upload form. ...Aurora... 02:38, 8 Ogos 2011 (UTC)
Sounds good :-) Thank you.
Perhaps you could also help me with another thing: Perbincangan_Pengguna:MGA73#re:Fail:Peta_Kecamatan_Tinggi_Raja_Kabupaten_Asahan.png_and_other_maps. User uses Google Translation so perhaps something will be lost in translation if I reply in English. As I understand the answer the user says that there was no copyright notice saying the file was free so that is why files are fair use and most likely nobody will complaint. That is not a good reason to accept fair use. Perhaps you can check source and see if there is something that can help us? And if not have a talk with the user? --MGA73 (bincang) 18:46, 9 Ogos 2011 (UTC)
I have the same understanding as you in regard of what Wagino is saying. When I went to the source website, I failed to find any copyright notice too. However, that since the images are from the Indonesian goverment official websites, doesn't the en:Template:IDGov / id:Templat:DU-PemerintahIndonesia apply? I'm a bit confused though because the former template said there is copyright but reproduction is permitted, while the latter claims public domain. ...Aurora... 07:21, 10 Ogos 2011 (UTC)
What a funny license/tag :-o I'm not even sure I understand what the template means. The file is copyrighted but it is allowed to use in some cases... The tag is a fair use-template so the file is not 100 % free. The template also says that you have to give a fair use-rationale. It should be possible to make a free file and that makes fair use invalid. Well perhaps we sould ask someone to draw free files for us in svg and keep the old ones untill the new ones are ready. --MGA73 (bincang) 11:21, 10 Ogos 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, apparently it was free before but not anymore. Dunno why. But if there's someone who can draw the maps, that would be good of course. However if we want to keep them until then, I think the delete tags should be taken down first. ...Aurora... 02:38, 11 Ogos 2011 (UTC)
Yes that would probably be best. That way we can keep the deletion category nice and short. Complicated files should perhaps be in another category. I added a list of all the files here so we can find it again. You can remove the tag (You have a bot right?). If you think you could add a small notice instead that file should be replaced with a free file if possible. --MGA73 (bincang) 08:56, 16 Ogos 2011 (UTC)
Ok, I see you've done it. ...Aurora... 06:41, 18 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

ucapan selamat datang?[sunting sumber]

Apa templat yang digunakan untuk memberikan ucapan selamat datang di wikipedia bahasa melayu? RaymondSutanto (bincang) 10:26, 10 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

Templat:Sd ...Aurora... 02:38, 11 Ogos 2011 (UTC)
Terima kasih atas pemberitahuannya. RaymondSutanto (bincang) 09:16, 11 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

Just blocked a user[sunting sumber]

Hi! I just blocked a user Khas:Sumbangan/112.202.66.167 (also check deleted usercontribs) for a short period. That is normally something I would not do on ms-wiki because of the language problems. However, it seemed to me that this was vandalism only and it also seems that no local admin was online. I hope you agree and if not please unblock and let me know. Feel free to make the block longer if needed - my intention was just to stop the user untill a local admin could check and find the right solution. --MGA73 (bincang) 13:27, 12 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

I see Yosri has taken action. ...Aurora... 02:05, 15 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

A little question[sunting sumber]

Hello! I'm user from Poland. Do You know someone who can translate a few sentences about one Polish artist to the Malay version? :) I'm talking about Józef Gosławski, the author of Chopin monument in Żelazowa Wola. Of course, only few words, like in, e.g., Italian or German version... Regards! TR (bincang) 19:30, 14 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

You can try Wikipedia:Memohon rencana and put your request under the heading J. ...Aurora... 02:05, 15 Ogos 2011 (UTC)
Thank You very much! TR (bincang) 08:57, 15 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

Request[sunting sumber]

Hello! Could you write an article about my town - Żagań on Malay Wikipedia? Only 3-4 sentences enough. I would be thankful. Saganum (bincang) 10:31, 18 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

As I said in the above section, you may want to try Wikipedia:Memohon rencana instead. ...Aurora... 07:35, 19 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

I also have a request :-) Perhaps you could look at Kategori:Cc-by-nc-2.0-dual and see if you can find a good license for the files? They look like derivative works and should therefore be fair use if they should stay. --MGA73 (bincang) 17:45, 18 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

I'll have a look. ...Aurora... 07:35, 19 Ogos 2011 (UTC)
I have a question regarding regarding derivative works, I see no mention at Commons:COM:DW that images like YosriKomikMalaysia.jpg (books on rack) or YosriPameranTamadunIslamKLCC.jpg (event poster), so how are these not free?. Indeed I fould several similar images on Commons (e.g. Fail:2009 new novels in a Berlin bookshop.JPG, Fail:2008 Taipei IT Month Day9 Official Poster.jpg). I noticed this COM:DEL, so that will settle YosriMancis.jpg. I'll continue to check the others. ...Aurora... 07:45, 22 Ogos 2011 (UTC)
The reason this is derivative works is that the covers of books or the packages or the posters are copyrighted. Whenever there is a photo or a drawing you can normally asume that it is copyrighted. If you put 100 books on a table and take a photo the single book will probably be en:de minimis but if there is only 2 de minimis would not apply - unless you the photo shows your living room and there just happens to be 2 books lying on the table. It is hard to tell when the book just happens to be there or is not the main subject. I nominated the 2 files you found for deletion on Commons. So lets see what happens. --MGA73 (bincang) 18:42, 22 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

Ok, let's wait for the results, though I've since found several more similar images. Anyway here's my evaluation of the rest of the pics:

  • Badak Sumbu Putih.jpg: Information display at Zoo Negara. Kinda doubt they have a copyright for that. Similar to File:Sokolarnia7.JPG.
  • Yosri Hikayat Amir hamzah.jpg: Old text on display at Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia. Manuscript itself should be PD-old, but no idea of the display case.
  • YosriPetaAlIdrisi.jpg: Old map in a museum. Similar to File:EmeryMolyneux-terrestrialglobe-Asia-1592-20061127.jpg.
  • YosriPerangkapLipas.jpg: per YosriMancis.jpg
  • YosriTehTarikTin.jpg: per YosriMancis.jpg
  • YosriYoyo.jpg: per YosriMancis.jpg ...Aurora... 07:55, 23 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of files without a license[sunting sumber]

Hi! Some time ago I added a notice to users that uploaded files without a license. Some are probably not active and some have just not fixed the problem. So there is still a lot left. So far I have only deleted a few of those files. Do you think the time is up so I can start deleting some fore files? If they are PD-old or from xx-wiki I will ofcourse fix the license. Anyway someone deleted the category Kategori:Imej yang tidak diketahui status hakcipta - I do not know why. --MGA73 (bincang) 17:47, 19 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

More than a month I think. If you can fix the files please fix them. If not, I think they should be listed for deletion first, then delete after (maybe) a week. As for the category, maybe he misunderstood what needs to be deleted. Restored it. ...Aurora... 07:45, 22 Ogos 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. I'll fix the license if I can and if not I will probably just let the files be for a while. Instead I will focus on files with a free license. All files that looks ok should be moved to Commons and the rest should be changed to Fair use or deleted or fixed. I have been working on Kategori:Imej domain awam (self) and instead of about 230 files there is now only 63 left. The first few files may be a problem and the rest are just not moved yet. --MGA73 (bincang) 10:44, 22 Ogos 2011 (UTC)
All done. Rest of the files need a check. I moved on to Kategori:Imej GFDL (self). There is a lot of stamps there. Doubt that the stamps are GFDL but not sure if fair use will be usable. --MGA73 (bincang) 20:06, 22 Ogos 2011 (UTC)
My two PD-self files probably should stay here. I wanted to avoid anyone uploading files using those names. I'll fix/delete the rest later. ...Aurora... 07:55, 23 Ogos 2011 (UTC)
Yes I agree that those two files should stay - that is why I did not move them to Commons :-) Thank you. --MGA73 (bincang) 16:59, 23 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

Uploading files from the Internet as own work or without a source[sunting sumber]

Hi! As you have noticed I have found several cases where users uploaded files from the Internet without telling about it. On Commons and most wikis users are warned not to do so again and if they do it again they are blocked. Perhaps it could be made more clear on the upload form that uploading internet files as own work or without source is strictly forbidden?

Also this Perbincangan Pengguna:Aplikasi#Fail:Veerapab.jpg worries me. If an admin uploads files as own work the user should not be an admin anymore. So I'm sure that there must be some sort of misunderstanding. Perhaps you could have a look? --MGA73 (bincang) 19:25, 25 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

I'll tweak the upload form again.
If he repeats it, I would agree with you. Having said that, getting adminship here is easier than in en.wiki or Commons, less scrutiny. ...Aurora... 07:35, 26 Ogos 2011 (UTC)
Yeah it can also be to hard on Commons :-( Thank you for your reply and your tweaks and your.... :-) --MGA73 (bincang) 18:39, 26 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

Changed MediaWiki:Licenses[sunting sumber]

Hi! I changed MediaWiki:Licenses and I really hope it is correct. There was a few errors or "bad choises" in the old one. --MGA73 (bincang) 06:56, 29 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

Angin[sunting sumber]

Jika anda yakin, boleh betulkan. Sedang di mobil, sukar memeriksa. Yosri (bincang) 16:58, 29 Ogos 2011 (UTC)

Fail:Istana Budaya and The Eye of Malaysia.jpg[sunting sumber]

Hi! Is this file not replacable? I mean could someone not just take a new photo (there is FOP in Malaysia)? --MGA73 (bincang) 11:40, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Nope. The Eye on Malaysia has been dismantled. ...Aurora... 08:45, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Files without a known license template[sunting sumber]

Hi!

Perhaps you could have a look at:

  1. File:Douphin.jpg
  2. File:KelasMarlin.jpg
  3. File:BombardierAPMM.jpg
  4. File:Ahnasution.jpg

These files does not have a known license template. I can set up my bot to tag files like that with a "nolicense"-template from time to time. But I suggest that those 4 files are fixed before I do that. --MGA73 (bincang) 19:06, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

The first three are copyrighted by the Malaysian Government. The last one comes from id.wiki (permission notice). ...Aurora... 07:21, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. But I need a little more help :-D Are the first 3 files free (like Templat:PD-USGov) or are they non-free? --MGA73 (bincang) 08:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Not yet I think. See en:Template:PD-MalaysiaGov. ...Aurora... 08:44, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Well "...and was published more than 50 years ago" does not look good. The files are not that old so I doubt that the files are free. --MGA73 (bincang) 09:09, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

I moved a tokohindonesia.com-file to Commons and started a deletion request to get a discussion on Commons if the permission is ok or not. If it is ok all the files with that permission could be moved to Commons. If not perhaps someone could ask for a better permission. --MGA73 (bincang) 15:33, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Noted. ...Aurora... 09:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
I just noticed that the three MalaysiaGov-files are unused. Fairuse files should be used or deleted. Perhaps you could have a look once you have nothing else to do :-D --MGA73 (bincang) 06:35, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
The images were in use until 10 Sept, while the licenses were only added on 13 Sept. I'm guessing the uploader wanted the images to stay but forgot to readd the images. I'll do that. ...Aurora... 08:14, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you! --MGA73 (bincang) 12:08, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Yuan Yu Fang[sunting sumber]

Saya tidak faham kenapa anda ingin kekalkan rencana tersebut. Tiada sumbangan diberikan dan sekadar atlet tidak layak ada rencana sendiri. Sekiranya kerana terima pingat pun masih tak layak, hanya layak disenaraikan di bawah penerima pingat tahun 2011 sahaja. Yosri (bincang) 11:21, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Sebab ada interwiki ke en.wiki yang memiliki jadual pencapaian beliau. Rencana2 lain tak ada, jadi saya tak sentuh. Tak apa, saya dah tambah sumbangan pingat sukan beliau. ...Aurora... 07:26, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Institut Pendidikan Guru[sunting sumber]

Salam, Aurora,, Saya selalu penuntu IPG ingin memaklumkan bahawa logo IPG berbentuk G digunakan disemua IPG Kampus dan IPGM. Jadi, logo IPG Kampus yang berasal dari maktab perguruan tidak lagi digunakan. Hanya logo IPG yang berbentuk G sahaja digunakan. 175.144.78.132

IPG kampus menggunakan logo rasmi IPG berbentuk huruf G. Sila rujuk laman web rasmi IPG Kampus Dato' Razali Ismail; Sumber:http://www.ipgmkdri.edu.my/

IPG Kampus tidak menggunakan logo maktab perguruan sebaliknya logo IPG sendiri yang berbentuk seperti G. Sepatutnya setiap ahli wikipedia sepatutnya ambil tahu tentang perubahan ini.

Terima kasih atas makluman. ...Aurora... 10:59, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Fair use of stamps[sunting sumber]

Hi! I noticed that you changed the license on some stamps to fair use. For Lembaran mini there are free files available on Commons and fair use should only be used if it is not possible to illustrate with free files. So perhaps you could have an extra look? --MGA73 (bincang) 11:25, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Actually, I was thinking along the line that lembaran mini from those countries aren't replacable, but I get your point. ...Aurora... 08:14, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes if the article was about lembaran mini in country x then you need a photo from country x but if the article is about lembaran mini as a general topic then photos from other countries should be usable. And that is why fair use is not easy: "It depends ...". Anyway it is cool that you are working on the files in the deletion category and the files without a license and .... If only more users would help :-) --MGA73 (bincang) 12:06, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Asrama SMK Tambunan[sunting sumber]

Sila kemukakan alasan dan sebab anda menghapuskan topik berikut Asrama SMK Tambunan jealous?? – Komen tanpa tandatangan ini diberikan oleh 7even

Saya jawab di Perbincangan:Asrama SMK Tambunan. ...Aurora... 07:34, 17 Oktober 2011 (UTC)

Minta tolong import[sunting sumber]

Minta tolong import rencana OpenGl- Kiub Berputar ke Wikibooks. --Kurnia [ bual ] 15:27, 27 Oktober 2011 (UTC)

Ciri import di ms.wikibooks telah dimatikan (dan di banyak wiki lain). Kalau nak aktifkan semula kena pergi bugzilla rasanya. Maklumat lanjut. Boleh anda usahakan? ...Aurora... 08:25, 28 Oktober 2011 (UTC)

I love your work ...[sunting sumber]

Choco chip cookie.jpg

You have really been doing a lot to cleanup. It is a pleasure to check out unused files (unused non-free files), uncategorized files (files without a license), the deletion category etc. Sure there is still files to work on but the list gets shorter and shorter and you do not just choose the easy solotion to look away or click delete, delete, delete without checking if that is the best solution ...

I think your work should be awarded and therefore give you a nice cookie :-) --MGA73 (bincang) 06:45, 28 Oktober 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. ...Aurora... 08:25, 28 Oktober 2011 (UTC)

Batu api?[sunting sumber]

Hello. May I know why my user account is deleted by you? Which edits that I'm considered at fault? My watchlist includes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MRSM_Terendak I graduated from this boarding school in 1994. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolej_Mara_Banting I graduated from this pre-university college in 1997. – Komen tanpa tandatangan ini diberikan oleh Shahrulazwad

Saya tidak menghapuskan akaun pengguna anda. Yang dihapuskan cuma laman pengguna anda (yg belum berisi ketika itu) yang diconteng seorang pengguna bernama Batuapi (kini telah disekat). ...Aurora... 08:52, 31 Oktober 2011 (UTC)
Oh begitu. Mohon maaf dan terima kasih. Laman Pengguna baru sahaja diisi hari ini. Shahrulazwad (bincang) 09:27, 31 Oktober 2011 (UTC)

Wonder why...[sunting sumber]

Hi! Do you have any idea why Fail:Zainuddin bin Maidin.jpg was uploaded without a license and a source? And Fail:Matlob.jpg was uploaded with a "bad license" and no source? It should be very easy to add a source and if it is own work it is also easy to pick a license. When I ask I generally have no luck... I nominated a few files for deletion as you can see here Perbincangan_pengguna:Malekhanif#Files_taken_from_the_web but there is no response. I do not know if it is a language problem, a question of understanding copyright or if it is simply because he thinks I'm so annoying. I can understand that it takes time to fix old uploads but I do not think it is acceptable for a sysop to upload new problematic files so I think something should be done. Perhaps some help in his own language would help? Any assistance is most welcome. --MGA73 (bincang) 10:04, 31 Oktober 2011 (UTC)

No idea. But they probably aren't own work. I do not think it is a language problem, however I don't know what is. I'll say something to him, though he ignored me the last time as well. ...Aurora... 13:18, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Pokok Akar Belimbing[sunting sumber]

Pokok itu memiliki rujukan, yang tiada pada rencana yang satu lagi, dan ia memiliki nama-nama lain Melayu yang anda padam tanpa mengalihnya. Yosri (bincang) 15:28, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Kalau anda cakap macam tu awal2 kan senang. ...Aurora... 01:45, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Problems with (un)used files[sunting sumber]

I really hate it that it is not sure that unused files are really unused. Do you have an idea how to fix it? Other than purge all articles? --MGA73 (bincang) 21:13, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Nope. Is it just this wiki or does it happen to other wikis as well? ...Aurora... 12:09, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
I have only seen it here... I'll poke all pages... --MGA73 (bincang) 16:45, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Ok all article pages should be poked now... Lets see if that helps. --MGA73 (bincang) 13:59, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
And now there is a lot less in Khas:Imej_tak_digunakan now. Could you try one or two to see if they are really unfree? --MGA73 (bincang) 07:53, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
I'll do it later. ...Aurora... 08:04, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. I wanted to write "unused" instead of "unfree" :-D --MGA73 (bincang) 17:03, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Yup, "Pautan ke laman ini" on image page seems to be working again, though "Khas:Imej tak digunakan" still hasn't been updated since my test yesterday. ...Aurora... 11:29, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Cool :-) My theory is that it only worked for pages edited since the feature was implemented so pages that were unchanged for ages were not up-to-date. So I asume it should be safe to delete the unused files that is unfree or without a valid license. --MGA73 (bincang) 14:48, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
I guess so. ...Aurora... 15:53, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Kategori:Files nominated for deletion on 2011-11-21[sunting sumber]

Hi!

At the moment there are almost 200 users who have one or more files in Kategori:Imej yang tidak diketahui status hakcipta (Imej ini tidak memiliki kategori lesen). We tried to inform some of the uploaders with only little result.

As a way to get files without a licensed fixed I nominated 91 files for deletion. I took the files where the uploader had only 1 file in the "no license-category". Getting the files fixed we would reduce the number of uploaders with "bad files" down with almost 50 %.

Some of the files are probably easy to fix. Others will most likely end up getting deleted. My plan is that we try this and see how it works. I expect that doing it this way will give a better result than nominating 2.000 files for deletion at one time.

Hope you like the approach. Ideas and comments are most welcome. --MGA73 (bincang) 16:37, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

We can try it. ...Aurora... 09:43, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Anda boleh tolong saya ?[sunting sumber]

Salam, sekian lama saya teringin sangat ingin menjadi penyelia wikipedia Bahasa Melayu.Boleh anda melantik saya sebagai salah seorang penyelia wikipedia Bahasa Melayu?..jika anda melantik saya sebagai penyelia wikipedia Bahasa Melayu.sy tak akan sia-siakan peluang yang anda berikan pada saya.sy tunggu jawapan dari anda. Nasir 36 18:31, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Tak boleh, saya tak kenal anda. Sebaliknya, anda boleh menolong diri sendiri dengan memenuhi syarat di Wikipedia:Penyelia/Permohonan. ...Aurora... 03:13, 5 Disember 2011 (UTC)

Could you help me with this one?[sunting sumber]

There is a "little edit war". I fail to see why this is GFDL but if I change to fair use it is reverted and when I nominate for deletion that is also removed. --MGA73 (bincang) 19:20, 2 Disember 2011 (UTC)

Let's see if my edit sticks. ...Aurora... 03:13, 5 Disember 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. Could you perhaps also check this out? --MGA73 (bincang) 20:30, 5 Disember 2011 (UTC)

I've no idea whether he is Zulk or whether he knows Zulk. ...Aurora... 09:37, 6 Disember 2011 (UTC)